Dr jay Feldman health is currently the primary goal of wellness programs at work. You’d like your program to be clear of purpose, don’t you?
A glance at the definitions of health does not aid in determining what exactly health is. Beyond these definitions, There are two approaches to looking at health:
- The reductionist/mechanistic view
- Health Creation view or production view
The divergence between these perspectives is evident in the various definitions of health and the way health concepts are carried out or implemented. Two different perspectives view health as an individual decision or a collective obligation.
When viewed through the reductionist/mechanistic lens, health is considered personal or individually determined. It is a view of the relationship between the body and its health. The reductionist/mechanistic view is a medical view of health. Health is an issue of medical origin with medical solutions provided through medical treatment.
According to this perspective, it is believed that health is medicalized. Medication is a process in which non-medical issues and concerns are identified in terms of medical issues generally in the context of diseases and disorders.
The concept of health, in this sense, is having an enlightened body. Health is a goal that is attained through deliberate and conscious actions. Maintaining health requires willpower, determination, self-control, self-discipline, and self-denial. Health is maintained by maintaining the body in line with the physical requirements.
Dr jay Feldman worksite wellness programs today, focusing on employee health status management, typically view health through the reductionist/mechanistic lens based on the medical model, which focuses on organ-related pathology within the individual. Health is considered a technical and medical issue. It is in keeping with American culture’s individualistic and hardworking essential values.
The producing or creating view of health considers health much more than sickness. This view examines the role of the environment, social economics, and behavior as factors or moderators for health. According to this perspective, health is not just about an individual and is considered in terms of cultural and social human beings.
In the production or creation of a perception of health, all are:
- What we’re treated to in the society
How fair is a society?
- How clean is the environment
- Working and living conditions
How much control people can exercise over their work and personal lives
In this way, health is a social obligation, and the assumption is that socioeconomic factors can be more influential in creating or sustaining health than medical treatment. In this perspective, the most critical factors that determine health are:
Specific factors unique to each particular
- Lifestyle and individual behavior
- Community and social networks.
- Work and living conditions
- General social, economic, cultural, and environmental conditions
How many of these factors do you have your current program dealing with?
From a wellness perspective at work, It is crucial to know what causes health issues and what’s needed to produce or promote nutritional health. This understanding can assist you in determining a goal for your program and making sure that the program and interventions align with the goal and the culture of the company.
In the workplace, we can find the best place to bring together the two perspectives on health. Workplace wellness must address personal responsibility and socioeconomic and cultural views through creating and encouraging healthy workplaces and positive and supportive workplaces as well as their climates, cultures, and environments.
While acknowledging and accepting conceptual differences, workplace wellness’s effectiveness and efficiency depend on how well implemented and executed interventions are and how notions of health are applied in the workplace.
Execution Matters More
Dr jay Feldman while concepts are essential, the implementation of the concepts is more important. I encourage you to allow me to assist you in creating your own efficient, effective, and long-lasting program. I specialise in coaching coordinators of worksite programs and developing Done With You worksite employee well-being and health programs.
The practice and field of workplace wellness in the present revolves around three key terms – well-being, health, and wellness. Other terms employed include:
- Flourishing and flourishing health promotion.
- High quality of living.
- The high quality of life.
But the three main ones are health, wellness, and well-being.
Since these terms are frequently used in conjunction or as synonyms, I’ve wondered what the difference or similarities between the terms are? When I thought of this question in my head, I thought it would be easy enough to look up their definitions and be able to answer my question.
However, I was not right. Definitions have only gotten me so far and certainly not much further. It seems that to get a better picture, one must understand the definition, context, and its definition.
